SKU: 96575775249

Ultimate Smooth 24/7 Silky Milk

Sale price$17.95 Regular price$19.95
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Ultimate Smooth 24/7 Silky MilkHeb je last van haar dat pluist, dof oogt en gewoon niet wil meewerken? De Wella Ultimate Smooth 24 7 Silky Milk is precies wat je zoekt. Deze leave in melk maakt je haar meteen zachter, glanzender en houdt pluis tot wel vier dagen onder controle. Geschikt voor alle haartypes, van steil tot krullend, en ook veilig voor gekleurd haar. Wat zijn de belangrijkste kenmerken van de Wella Ultimate Smooth 24 7 Silky Milk? De Silky Milk maakt deel uit van de

Heb je last van haar dat pluist, dof oogt en gewoon niet wil meewerken? De Wella Ultimate Smooth 24/7 Silky Milk is precies wat je zoekt. Deze leave-in melk maakt je haar meteen zachter, glanzender en houdt pluis tot wel vier dagen onder controle. Geschikt voor alle haartypes, van steil tot krullend, en ook veilig voor gekleurd haar.

Wat zijn de belangrijkste kenmerken van de Wella Ultimate Smooth 24/7 Silky Milk?

De Silky Milk maakt deel uit van de Ultimate Smooth lijn van Wella, speciaal ontwikkeld voor haar dat droog, dof of pluizig is. Hier zie je in één oogopslag wat je kunt verwachten:

  • Pluisvrij haar tot 96 uur
  • Tot 85% gladder haarsilhouet
  • Zichtbaar meer glans na gebruik
  • Werkt op steil, golvend én krullend haar
  • Veilig voor gekleurd haar
  • Vegan en dermatologisch getest
  • Handig formaat van 30ml, ideaal voor onderweg

Hoe gebruik ik de Wella Ultimate Smooth 24/7 Silky Milk?

  1. Was je haar zoals gewoonlijk en dep het droog met een handdoek.
  2. Verdeel een kleine hoeveelheid Silky Milk gelijkmatig door je vochtige haar.
  3. Kamm het product door van midden naar punt, vermijd de haarwortels.
  4. Föhn je haar of laat het op zijn eigen tempo drogen.
  5. Niet uitspoelen, de melk blijft in je haar zitten en werkt de hele dag door.

Wil je nóg meer glans en een extra gladde finish? Combineer de Silky Milk met de Wella Ultimate Smooth Miracle Oil Serum. Een paar druppels serum over de gedroogde lengten geeft je haar die zachte, zijdeachtige uitstraling die de hele dag blijft zitten.

Hoe werkt de Wella Ultimate Smooth 24/7 Silky Milk precies?

Je haar voelt direct soepeler aan en ziet er glanzender uit. Dat is geen toeval: de formule combineert squalane en omega-9, twee ingrediënten die samen het haar van binnenuit voeden én aan de buitenkant een beschermende laag vormen. Die laag houdt vocht vast en laat vocht van buitenaf, zoals luchtvochtigheid, minder makkelijk binnen. Dat is precies waarom je haar ook op vochtige dagen glad en glanzend blijft.

Dof, ruw of pluizig haar reageert hier goed op. Voor Wella glanzend haar dat er dag na dag verzorgd uitziet, is de Silky Milk een slimme keuze.

Is de Wella Ultimate Smooth Silky Milk geschikt voor krullend haar?

Ja, de Silky Milk werkt op alle haartypes, ook op krullend en golvend haar. De melk helpt je krullen te definiëren zonder ze zwaar te maken, en houdt pluisjes langs de krullen weg. Werk het product gelijkmatig door je natte krullen en droog je haar zonder te veel te wrijven. Zo blijven je krullen gevormd en glanzend.

Hoe lang blijft het anti-pluiseffect van de Wella Ultimate Smooth Silky Milk in het haar?

Tot 96 uur, ofwel vier dagen. Dat geldt zolang je je haar in die periode niet wast. De formule werkt niet alleen op het moment van aanbrengen, maar beschermt je haar ook daarna tegen luchtvochtigheid en pluis van buitenaf. Zo hou je langer profijt van één behandeling.

Is de Wella Ultimate Smooth Silky Milk veilig voor gekleurd haar?

Ja, de Silky Milk is veilig voor gekleurd haar. De formule tast de kleur niet aan en is dermatologisch getest. Heb je sterk beschadigd of geblondeerd haar? Dan is de Wella Ultimate Repair lijn een betere keuze, want die richt zich specifiek op herstel van beschadigde haarstructuur. De Silky Milk focust op gladheid en glans voor haar dat structureel nog prima in orde is.

Ultimate Smooth of Ultimate Repair: wat past bij jouw haar?

Dat hangt af van de staat van je haar. Heb je pluizig, dof of droog haar maar zijn er geen echte breekpunten of gespleten punten? Dan is de Wella Ultimate Smooth lijn, en dus ook de Silky Milk, de juiste keuze. Is je haar sterk beschadigd door blondering of veel chemische behandelingen? Dan heb je meer baat bij de Wella Ultimate Repair lijn, die gericht is op het herstellen van de haarstructuur van binnenuit.

Voor haar dat er gewoon goed en glanzend uit moet zien, elke dag opnieuw, is Ultimate Smooth de slimste keuze. Zeker als je wella ultimate smooth silky milk wil kopen en direct resultaat verwacht.

Meer weten over dit product?

Heb je een vraag over de Wella Ultimate Smooth 24/7 Silky Milk of wil je weten welk product het beste bij jouw haartype past? Neem gerust contact met ons op via [email protected] of bel ons tijdens kantooruren. We helpen je graag de juiste keuze maken.

Bestel je voor meer dan €35? Dan ontvang je je bestelling gratis thuisbezorgd. Schrijf je ook in voor onze nieuwsbrief en ontvang als eerste nieuws over acties en nieuwe haarproducten. Zo mis je nooit een aanbieding op de Ultimate Smooth lijn.

Overige informatie

Fabrikant Contact

Manufacturer's name: Wella Germany GmbH
Street address: Berliner Allee 65
City: Darmstadt
Postal code: 64295
Country: Germany
E-mail: [email protected]

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 96575775249

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 1476 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
G
Verified Purchase
Gary Moreau, Author
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 4
Marx had the proletariat, Mao had the farmers, America has the owners of financial capital
Format: Kindle
What makes Jonathan Levy’s book so informative is that it is truly a parallel history of its politics and its economics. And only by viewing these two intertwined paths side by side can you truly understand the myth of the American free market. America’s politics and its economics have never, since the country’s founding, been separated. The state has been an integral part of everything economic to an extent that would make the most rabid socialist gasp in horror. The only difference is that while the Marxist state stood side by side with the proletariat, and Mao built the number two economy in the world on the support of farmers, America built its economic marvel on the backs of, and for the benefit of, the owners of financial capital. That’s not all bad, mind you. It takes workers, farmers, and the owners of capital to build a modern economy. The tension comes when there is a lack of balance between the importance the state attaches to each. And there can be little surprise that America’s politicians have put the owners of financial capital at the top of their list of priorities. Politicians, after all, can do nothing without power, and power comes via the electoral process, a process that is today fueled by obscene amounts of money. And who has all that money? The American economic narrative is a misleading tale of meritocracy and free markets. The Horatio Alger-based myth is that you are only limited by your skills and your ambition. And like most enduring myths there is a thread of truth to it. Many successful people truly deserve what they have achieved. But does anyone really possess $150 billion of personal merit? Can we statistically accept that the wealthiest nation in the world is also one of the most financially unequal without seeing a pattern of bias? Perhaps the most selectively quoted book in history is Adam Smith’s “Wealth of Nations”, published, strangely enough, in 1776. Often credited with being the father of capitalism, Smith argued that markets free of excessive regulation would be more efficient than markets that were overly regulated, although Smith “made no categorical separation between the political and the economic, or state and market.” Smith did, however, warn against the socially destructive power of monopolies, which unregulated markets will not protect against, and he correctly predicted that the excessive division of labor would lead to a degree of labor and wealth inequity that would destroy society. At the time when US Steel, General Electric, and General Motors, among many others, were the power behind America’s global economic hegemony, most Americans earned a living through wages. And those wages were made possible by long term fixed investments that created jobs. They were generally big bets that took a long time to earn a return but that aligned with the jobs-first priorities of most companies. (Employees first, communities second, shareholders a distant third.) And while not every employee enjoyed the same salary, the differences between the top earners and the average earners was a fraction of what it is today. That era, of course, is long over. The current economy is geared toward the creation of wealth through the short-term investment in assets that will appreciate rapidly and are highly liquid. At the moment that is the stock market and synthetic financial tools pedaled by hedge funds, banks, and the like. The problem is that the wage market encompassed much of America. The asset appreciation market encompasses only a tiny sliver of the richest among us. There is spillover, of course. The lawyers, analysts, consultants, bankers, and sales people who serve the asset appreciation market are doing quite well. But the man or woman who has less education and who might have made a decent living in a steel mill or car assembly plant, has lost out. And despite what the politicians will tell you, the gap is getting wider. (I spent a career in corporate industry, have a college degree in economics, have been a CEO, and have served on four public company boards. I know enough to know that Levy knows what he’s talking about.) The second important point to come out of all this is that economics is not really a “science” as most people think of that term. There is a shared jargon and there are commonly accepted principles. The very idea that there is an economy that is distinct from all other aspects of human existence, including the state, however, is a relatively recent concept. The weakness of the distinction, in fact, is clearly demonstrated by the remarkable reality of just how diverse the history of the American economy is. The sun doesn’t always rise in the east in the world of economics. In each of the economic eras Levy describes it is stunning how few people actually formulated the thinking that defined them. I will join some of the other reviewers in suggesting that the author could have spent more time explaining some of the jargon inevitably found in a treatise on economics. The layman obviously wasn’t his target audience but the book, I believe, could have read more smoothly and been much, much shorter. (The editor and publisher have to take some of the blame for this.) Even if you have to slog your way through the more tedious sections on global capital flows and such, however, you’ll get something from the book even if you’ve never set foot in an economics classroom. If you get no more than the fact that the free market is a myth and that most long term capital that actually creates jobs and income for the average American is actually provided by you, the taxpayer, not the Wall Street capitalist, you will better understand why there is so much division in our country right now. We don’t have a democratic economy. The young wonders of Silicon Valley would have nothing if it wasn’t for your tax dollars and your pension plan, if you’re still lucky enough to have one. We can do better. We have to. The economic inequity we have now is simply not sustainable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2022
J
Verified Purchase
Jose Calderon
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Good value for the money.
Format: Hardcover
Book in excellent condition, delivered promptly.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jared Dean
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Great read.
Format: Paperback
Gives a great perspective of how technology has developed and shaped the economy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2024
J
Verified Purchase
james hammill
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
How Capitalism Shaped America
Format: Hardcover
Very impressive analysis. Unfortunately the author ended his analysis in 2010. Wish he had offered some thoughts on what should be done as opposed to what is being done in this age of economic chaos.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2021
J
J. Miller
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 3
Some good footnotes to other histories
Format: Audiobook
This book is impressive in two key ways: first it re-surfaces recurring elements in the political/economic intersect over time (the on-again off-again use of "the gold standard," the company invasion into the intimate life of the laborer) and second it gets into the gory details of policies and logistics that shaped or limited major historical events (like the availability and movement of gold going into WWII). That said, it's pretty massive for providing just those two things. It comes up weaker from Nixon on to today which undermines its contemporary relevance: it stamps everything from 1980 on as "chaos" and tries to back away slowly. It spends some time on the change in stock ownership of the 1980s (prefer Ho's Liquidated or Nace's Gangs of America; the pivot from pensions to 401ks is lost, Supermoney is not mentioned), spends time on Enron (see also McLean's The Smartest Guys in the Room) but seems to mostly ignore terror and catastrophe (consider Klein's The Shock Doctrine), spends time on the 2008 meltdown (prefer Lewis's The Big Short and Foroohar's Makers & Takers) but comes up short of Occupy Wall Street, VC-fueled gig economy corporations and cryptocurrencies. I'm suspecting that the "Chaos" isn't so much chaos but rather "Distributed Tactical Illegibility" (to borrow from Scott's Seeing Like a State): where the control of information can be used to cultivate socioeconomic advantage, then powerful people within a state will maintain their privilege through obfuscating the information they're using to create and maintain that advantage -- this is why insider trading is illegal as an abuse of power and trust *but also legal for members of the US legislature*. It's also a bit weak (at least in Audible form) of noting which bits of economic history would be echoed or reversed over time; tracing the evolution of a social construct through a twisting maze of legal decisions to current incomprehensibility does have this effect. I did find its larger position interesting, if perhaps a bit lost in the larger prose, that capitalism is about pricing the future into the present and it's gone off the proverbial rails because informational ubiquity compounds short-termism to collapse the future into the present in both public and private enterprise. Or, to put it another way, money can't escape the gravity of our economic expectation for near-horizon growth to invest in a future that our larger society wants and might reasonably expect and while legislators need to govern for the long term they're only elected for the short term and judged by people's everyday-experiences of the social-economy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2021

recommand products