SKU: 10818126486

Instant Relief™ Dandruff Shampoo

$23.36 $25.95
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on intrade-apc.com >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Instant Relief™ Dandruff Shampoo[description_mini_start] Evenwichtige, natuurlijke anti roos shampoo met dermosoft decalact MB. [description_mini_end] [description_teaser_start] Het is tijd om voorgoed afscheid te nemen van roos in je haar. Instant Relief Dandruff Shampoo kalmeert onmiddellijk de aan roos gerelateerde symptomen, verwijdert schilfers op krachtige wijze en brengt het vochtgehalte van de hoofdhuid in balans. Deze lichtgewichte, natuurlijke anti roos shampoo zonder

[description_mini_start]

Evenwichtige, natuurlijke anti-roos shampoo met dermosoft® decalact MB.

[description_mini_end]

[description_teaser_start]

Het is tijd om voorgoed afscheid te nemen van roos in je haar. Instant Relief™ Dandruff Shampoo kalmeert onmiddellijk de aan roos gerelateerde symptomen, verwijdert schilfers op krachtige wijze en brengt het vochtgehalte van de hoofdhuid in balans. Deze lichtgewichte, natuurlijke anti-roos shampoo zonder sulfaten reinigt zachtjes alle haartypes terwijl het de droge, schilferige hoofdhuid kalmeert om symptomen die gepaard gaan met roos, zoals schilfering, irritatie en jeuk te verlichten.

[description_teaser_end]

[description_full_start]

Hoe het werkt

Roos in je haar kan vervelende bijwerkingen veroorzaken en is moeilijk weg te werken. Daarom geloven we in het effectief verwijderen van roos. We hebben Instant Relief™ Dandruff Shampoo samengesteld om zowel je symptomen onmiddellijk te verlichten evenals roos te bestrijden en te voorkomen.

Deze natuurlijke anti-roos shampoo biedt hydraterende en ontstekingsremmende hulp aan je hoofdhuid met actieve ingrediënten zoals aloë vera en glycerine. Tegelijkertijd gaan de antimicrobiële dermosoft® decalact MB en biologische tea tree olie in de shampoo aan het werk om de roos in je haar te bestrijden.

De meest voorkomende oorzaak van haarroos is een schimmel genaamd malassezia. Dermosoft® decalact MB is een natuurlijk, multifunctioneel actief ingrediënt dat deze schimmel bestrijdt, een natuurlijk antimicrobieel middel waarvan bewezen is dat het werkt tegen malassezia. In combinatie met biologische tea tree olie, een ander anti-schimmel ingrediënt, werkt deze shampoo tegen roos effectief om dode huidcellen, bacteriën en productopbouw van je hoofdhuid te verwijderen.

Zodra je hoofdhuid proper en zuiver is, hydrateert en verzorgt het biologische appelextract je hoofdhuid en helpt het om een jeukende, droge hoofdhuid in de toekomst te voorkomen.

[description_full_end]

[declaration_start]

200 ml/6.8 fl.oz.

Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice*, Aqua, Lauryl Glucoside, Glycerin, Sodium Caproyl/Lauroyl Lactylate, Disodium Cocoyl Glutamate, Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate, Sodium PCA, Xanthan Gum, Citric Acid, PCA Glyceryl Oleate, Sodium Benzoate, Melaleuca Alternifolia Leaf Oil*, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride, Sodium Chloride, Sodium Gluconate, Potassium Sorbate, Pyrus Malus Fruit Extract*, Aroma (natuurlijk).*Biologisch ingrediënt.

99,2% van de totale ingrediënten is van natuurlijke oorsprong. 53,6% van de totale ingrediënten is afkomstig van biologische landbouw.

Deze shampoo tegen roos heeft een frisse, houtachtige en kruidige geur die komt van de biologische tea tree olie.

pH-waarde: 4,0-4.5.

[declaration_end]

[guide_start]

Verdeel de shampoo tegen roos gelijkmatig over je natte hoofdhuid en masseer tot het begint te schuimen. Spoel en herhaal indien gewenst. Sluit af met een hydraterende conditioner.

Voor het beste resultaat, gebruik je deze anti-roos shampoo in combinatie met een roos behandeling. Wij adviseren om dit middel tegen roos in combinatie te gebruiken met Instant Relief™ Scalp Spray.

[guide_end]

[faq_start]

Wat veroorzaakt haarroos?

[faq_title_end]

Verschillende mogelijke oorzaken van haarroos zijn:

  • Droge, schilferige hoofdhuid
  • Overproductie van talg
  • Slecht eetpatroon
  • Niet vaak genoeg je haar wassen
  • Huidaandoeningen zoals eczeem
  • Overgroei van schimmel (malassezia)

Wat de oorzaak ook is, Instant Relief™ Dandruff Shampoo is vaak de beste manier om roos te behandelen. Lees onze blog over wat de roos in je haar je probeert te vertellen.

[faq_item_end]

Wie kan er baat hebben bij het gebruik van een shampoo tegen roos?

[faq_title_end]

Instant Relief™ Dandruff Shampoo is ontwikkeld om mannen en vrouwen te helpen die last hebben van roos of een vaak droge, geïrriteerde of schilferige hoofdhuid hebben. Deze natuurlijke anti-roos shampoo werkt op alle haartypes. Maar als je geen huidaandoeningen zoals roos hebt, raden we je aan om kennis te maken met onze andere shampoos voor beschadigd haar, krullend haar of blond haar.

[faq_item_end]

Hoe vaak kan ik een anti-roos shampoo gebruiken?

[faq_title_end]

Door de zachte formule kun je deze natuurlijke anti-roos shampoo zonder sulfaten elke keer dat je je haar wast gebruiken (ongeveer 2-3 keer per week). Afhankelijk van de conditie van je hoofdhuid, moet je misschien wel vaker wassen. Blijf deze shampoo tegen roos gebruiken, zelfs nadat je symptomen zijn verdwenen, om je hoofdhuid gezond te houden.

[faq_item_end]

Is deze shampoo geschikt voor de gevoelige huid?

[faq_title_end]

Dankzij het hoge gehalte aan verzachtende aloë vera en glycerine, en het ontbreken van agressieve sulfaten, siliconen, parabenen of uitdrogende alcohol, is deze antimicrobiële shampoo tegen roos uitermate geschikt voor mensen met een gevoelige of geïrriteerde hoofdhuid.

[faq_end]

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 10818126486

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 1922 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013
M
Verified Purchase
michaelshive
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 3
Thought-provoking but misses its "target audience"
Format: Paperback
First, the good. This is a thought-provoking book that takes complex subject matter and makes it very easy to understand. In "The Evolution of Adam" Dr. Enns does an excellent job on many fronts - most notably giving a brief overview of the history of biblical criticism and its importance to the evolution debate. His ability to distill ideas down to the core was impressive. If I had to recommend to someone 50 pages on biblical criticism I might tell them to read the first portion of this book. However, as I read the book I kept wondering how the path he was taking would allow him to argue for an Evangelical perspective (as he says in the introduction). In short, he does not. Not even close. Dr. Enns must not know his target audience very well if he thinks that this book is targeted for Evangelicals. Virtually none of the positions that he espouses in this book are even close to what an Evangelical Christian would be comfortable defending. He has little regard for any historicity behind any of the biblical accounts and frequently tosses out the phrase "most scholars agree" as a trump card. He does a good job of helping understand the culture and history that surrounded the biblical accounts yet in the end the reader is left wondering where story and history actually meet or if possibly the whole thing was simply conjured up for political reasons. In the end, I think the question the reader is left with is "does it matter if anything in the Bible ACTUALLY happened?". How you answer that may well determine how much you enjoy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Peter Enns "Upends" Tradition!
Format: Paperback
One cannot but deeply admire what Peter Enns has managed to produce within the span of less than 150 pages - not counting his endnotes. Kudos as well for his penetrating exegetical insights...to say nothing as regards his courage: few conservative evangelicals (and even fewer fundamentalists) will find the title "The Evolution of Adam" something that warms the heart. And yet what Enns has produced here not only is revolutionary (in a very real sense - see below) but may well prove to be one of the more controversial books on the science/theology debate of recent years. Why so? Primarily because (according to Enns - Part Two of his book) Paul's creative use (in Romans) of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis was primarily for apologetic purposes...a matter that will be discussed in greater detail below. But we begin with Part One. Essentially Part One (four chapters) represents Enns' understanding of the crucial importance Ancient Near Eastern influences exerted upon the biblical writers - the writer/s of the Genesis creation account in particular. Enns (correctly in my view)hammers this point repeatedly for the reader to consider - i.e., the bible (the whole of it) was not written in a cultural vacuum unsullied by the surrounding culture/s of pagan religious thought, whether ancient Sumerian, Babylonian, or Greco-Roman. Indeed, to do otherwise would have been an impossibility - somewhat like trying to walk along the Tibetan foothills while refusing to breathe its polluted 'pagan' air. None of us ever fully escapes the surrounding influences of culture - and the bible was never intended to do so; rather, God (if one believes in biblical inspiration...as Enns does) works fully within the conceptual categories of culture. Hence, the two creation accounts in Genesis come to us fully embedded with the concepts of Ancient Near Eastern thought patterns. Perhaps the most we can say here is that the Genesis accounts represent (in varying ways) the "demythologizing" of prior Ancient Near Eastern accounts: the God of Israel is not to be identified with any aspect (sun, moon, stars, etc.) of the created order. So far so good. There's nothing really new here that hasn't been said already by any number of conservative evangelical scholars. Part Two, however, is something entirely different. Here Enns focuses his attention on Paul's creative use of the Old Testament, seeing as how the death and resurrection of Christ has caused Paul to look at the OT writings from a radically different perspective - Romans 5:12-21 in particular. These verses have a long, long history in the Christian Church as providing the church's understanding of how sin and death entered the world of human existence: we all "inherited" sin and death in and through the disobedience of Adam back in Eden. Not so...says Enns. And here is where his account veers off in a direction entirely different from traditional orthodox belief - for, according to Enns, Paul gave a particular 'Pauline spin' to these verses that cannot be found either in the OT itself, or in the Second Temple Judaism of which Paul himself was a part. Because the death and resurrection of Christ radically altered Paul's understanding of God's redemptive work in the world he (Paul) "found" in the Adam story an ideal explanation for why it is all Jews and Gentiles alike share in the universal experience of sin and death. Therefore, Adam's disobedience in Eden is NOT the cause of the universal human experience of sin and death (per Enns); rather, the story of Adam's disobedience served Paul's apologetic purposes...quite apart from whatever the story's original intention might have been. The true "origin" of sin and death remains a mystery, for the answer is not to be found (indeed if it can be "found" at all!) in the early Genesis account of Adam and Eve. And here is where we encounter the book's controversial nature, for Enns' view represents a dramatic departure from the traditional view - a traditional view that has a rich theological heritage that passes directly through the Reformation all the way back to Augustine. As previously stated, I deeply admire and respect what Enns has done here. For the most part I think he is on the right track. Furthermore, he makes mention of the fact that recent developments in biology have strongly indicated that we cannot possibly trace all modern humans back to an original "Adam and Eve." However, we knew that already...quite apart from modern biology informing us of the fact. Anthropology and paleontology had already amassed considerable evidence that proto-humans and modern humans were spread across the earth long before any conceivable Adam and Eve could have existed. Apparently, however, modern biology speaks with a more powerful voice than anthropology; thus, we are seeing a spate of books recently on the topic of whether or not Adam and Eve were historical - Enns' book being only one of a growing number. (Due to the geneologies in early Genesis we are somewhat limited in "how far back" we can place an Adam and Eve. Placing them 25 to 40 thousand years into the past in order somehow to allow them to be the true ancestors of all modern humans does a grave injustice to the geneologies that plain and simply do not allow for this sort of radical time reversal - a matter that any number of evangelicals, who have done this sort of thing, seem unwilling to appreciate. The early Genesis geneologies, even allowing for some "gaps," serve as a control against such unwarranted time expansion. An Adam and Eve of perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC appears to be about the limit of what we can reasonably expect). In any case, Enns has raised a thorny and difficult issue in a way previous books on the question have not, and I believe his book will contribute substantially to more open theological discussion (one hopes without heated rancor) on the debate. In the meanwhile, some final thoughts. Personally, I find it more than a tad curious that David Rohl (a somewhat controversial Egyptologist) has recently authored a book (From Eden to Exile, Greenleaf Press) in which he strongly defends an historical Adam - and yet Rohl acknowledges that he is an atheist. All this is most strange: an evangelical scholar arguing against an historical Adam while an atheistic historian argues for one! ("What fools these mortals be!") I happen to agree with much of what Enns writes. However, I think Rohl has a point- even though how he fleshes his historical Adam out is somewhat bizarre. For one thing, I'm not entirely comfortable (despite some of Enns' powerful arguments) with a geneology of Jesus in the Gospels that would include "fictious" characters who never even existed. (I might as well inform you that my great, great grandfather was Dr. Jekyll and my great, great, great grandfather was Mr. Hyde). I don't see why getting rid of an historical Adam is at all necessary. Enns himself offers the possibility that OT Israel viewed Adam as their senior partriarch - the man who originally started the "clan." I personally see great possibilities here via leaving Adam within historical existence as Israel's original, grand patriarch. The origin of sin and death via the Adam and Eve story is another matter entirely. Biology and anthropology together appear to just plain and simply rule it out - and sticking Adam back into the age of the Cro-Magnons and Neaderthals in order to "save" the doctrine is a clear instance of an act of sheer desperation. But I see no reason why we necessarily have to conclude that the "origin" of sin and death (if that's the right word even to use...which I'm not even sure about) can only be regarded as lost in the misty past. I think there is a possible way forward here, and even via an historical Adam, while at the same time embracing what Enns is talking about. I think there may well be a way to retain a personal Adam (perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC), while also showing how sin and death had their origin in him...but with an entirely different understanding that is informed by Enns' book. Unfortunately, spelling all that out is - like "The Evolution of Adam" - a book unto itself. And Amazon commentary is not the place where one is allowed to "write a book" - quite apart from how lengthy my own commentary here has been. In the meanwhile...kudos again to Enns for his truly provocative and highly insightful contribution to the cause. His vigorous defense of the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection is profoundly gratifying. Because of his firm stance here no one can accuse him of being unorthodox! (NOTE: Readers interested in a critical analysis of David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: the 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible," and why this book is of such strategic importance for Old Testament studies - scholars in particular, can easily access my recent review of this book (titled "David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History") by clicking on "See All My Reviews" directly above, or by going to the book's Amazon website. Hope you enjoy the read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2012
L
Verified Purchase
Leslie Danner
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
A must-have for students and researchers
Format: Spiral-bound
I use this all the time. The Concise Guide to APA Style (7th Edition) is incredibly helpful, easy to navigate, and much less overwhelming than flipping through the full manual. Great quick reference for papers, citations, and formatting.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kapplez
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for learning APA format
Format: Spiral-bound
If you are one learning how to write, cite and use references in APA format this is the perfect book for you. It literally breaks down everything for you and has examples of what to do. It has an example essay if you need something to reference as well. I'd recommend this book to anyone that has a strict professor or that is learning how to write APA.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 15, 2026

recommand products

Hanglamp 6 smokey spiegel/glas
149.50
Touwen Hanglamp Bamboe
137.00
Bio-ethanol brander 48cm
325.00
Led plafondlamp Aluminiumkleur
127.00
Kerstman 40cm
15.00