Pay in installments of $33.62 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
XCVR-080W60 Ciena® Compatible Transceiver DWDM CH60 SFP 1000Base (C-Band, 1529.55nm, SMF, 80km, LC, Ind Temp)XCVR 080W60 Ciena Compatible Transceiver DWDM CH60 SFP 1000Base (C Band, 1529. 55nm, SMF, 80km, LC, Ind Temp) ATGBICS Ciena compatible XCVR 080W60 SFP 1000Base DWDM form factor network transceiver supports a distance of up to 80km over single mode fibre (SMF) using a wavelength of 1529. 55nm via an LC Duplex connector. This product operates within an industrial temperature range. Digital optical monitoring (DOM) support is also present enabling real
XCVR-080W60 Ciena® Compatible Transceiver DWDM CH60 SFP 1000Base (C-Band, 1529.55nm, SMF, 80km, LC, Ind Temp)
ATGBICS Ciena® compatible XCVR-080W60 SFP 1000Base-DWDM form factor network transceiver supports a distance of up to 80km over single-mode fibre (SMF) using a wavelength of 1529.55nm via an LC Duplex connector. This product operates within an industrial temperature range. Digital optical monitoring (DOM) support is also present enabling real-time monitoring of the parameters of the fibre optic transceiver.
Our product meets the specification of Ciena® XCVR-080W60 and we proudly offer a compatibility guarantee and limited lifetime warranty. Our rigorously tested products record a unique traceable serial number and are fully compatible with all MSA (Multi-Source Agreement) and IEEE standards & protocols.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Product
Although I have a medium dark skin I've lived through various problems associated with sunburn.I was looking for a product and I saw this one on Amazon then I decided to give it a try.I'm really happy with the results.I bought 70spf to use on my face.It is really light, it lets my skin to breath through it.It smells really good.It is easy to apply.It doesn't leave whitness.All in all I really recommend this prduct !
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2012
★★★★★ 4
I love that it's a dry-touch and that my face doesn't ...
I love that it's a dry-touch and that my face doesn't feel greasy all day. However, it almost dries too fast and it makes it harder to rub into your skin. I don't like feeling like I'm "tugging" on my face when I put it on.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2015
★★★★★ 5
good stuff
I like this sun block. It doesn't sting my eyes and it seems to be effective. I am out in the sun a lot and I don't burn with this on, so it must work. It's not greasy so I use it under make up.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2011
★★★★★ 5
Easy to apply, neutral smell, and lasts long
I usually hate sunscreen, but this brand is acceptable. It doesn't leave a terrible waxy feeling on your skin, and it's easy to apply on your face. Also, it doesn't have an overpowering smell, which is nice.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 17, 2013
★★★★★ 2
Dry-touch but still uncomfortable to wear
It didn't rub in like regular sunblock, I suppose because the of the 'dry-touch'. But I could still feel it on my skin and was a little bit itchy. If you continue to rub it actually kind of peels away-then obviously negating putting it on in the first place. :(
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2014